You're confirmed

You're in! Welcome to the ResearchGeek newsletter.

From now on, you're going to receive:

  1. 1 tactical idea you can use as a researcher
  2. 1 real-life example of how to implement it (+ how others have)
  3. 1 honest take on the industry that researchers have privately, but don't usually tell others

From time to time, you may also receive some behind-the-scenes emails with resources from the ResearchGeek ecosystem.

Now let's get you set up with one of our most popular newsletter editions →

Start reading →
~3 min read📖 0/5 sections0% read

— Most-read edition · Issue #14

The 5-minute research brief that actually gets stakeholder buy-in

3 min read · Loved by 12,400+ researchers

Here's a situation almost every researcher I know has been in:

“I sent the research brief to my stakeholders two weeks ago. The meeting was yesterday. Nobody had read it. We spent the first 20 minutes just getting everyone aligned on what we were even studying.”

Sound familiar? The problem isn't that stakeholders don't care. It's that most research briefs are written for researchers — not for the people who actually need to act on them.

This issue is about fixing that in under 5 minutes.

The Tactical Idea

The “So What” Brief — write for the decision, not the study

Most briefs open with the methodology. Nobody outside research cares about that first. Instead, restructure your brief around three questions:

1. What decision does this research unlock?

Put this in the first line. “This research will tell us whether to invest in a mobile-first checkout redesign.”

2. What do we already know / not know?

Two bullets max. This shows you're filling a specific knowledge gap, not doing research in a vacuum.

3. What will we do with the answer?

Map each outcome to a team action. “If users can't complete the flow, we pause the launch.”

After that: method, timeline, what you need from the team. Keep it to one page.

Real-Life Example

How a researcher at a fintech cut meeting prep time by half

Priya, a senior UX researcher at a payments startup, spent 3 hours preparing briefs that her stakeholders would skim — or skip entirely.

She switched to the “So What” format for one sprint. The difference was immediate.

Stakeholders who read the brief beforehand22% → 81%
Average alignment meeting duration52 min → 28 min
Revision requests post-study4.2 avg → 1.1 avg

The format also worked at Barclays and a mid-sized healthcare consultancy.

The Honest Take

Most researchers write briefs to protect themselves, not to inform

There. I said it.

A 10-page brief with a 3-page methodology section is a comfort blanket. Nobody reads it, and the research still gets ignored.

The best researchers write briefs their most time-pressed stakeholder could read in a lift. That's the bar.

That's it for this week. If you try the “So What” Brief, hit reply and let me know how it lands.

— The ResearchGeek team

ResearchGeek · A weekly newsletter for market researchers

Nice work — here's how you read it.

Every ResearchGeek edition is designed to be read actively, not skimmed. Here's a snapshot of your session.

0m 0s
Time spent
📖
0/5
Sections read
0%
Completion
Section breakdown
Introduction-
The Tactical Idea-
Real-Life Example-
The Honest Take-
Closing-

Your next edition lands this week

Every issue follows the same format: one idea, one example, one honest take. See you in your inbox.

Explore ResearchGeek →